(Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Briefe Über China (1694-1716): Die Korrespondenz MIT Barthélemy Des Bosses S.J. that the microfilms remain the property of the Niedersächsische Landesbibliothek, and that permission to copy must be obtained from Hannover beforehand. Cook and Rosemont have included a splendid introduction to the collection, which describes the historical and theological background of Leibniz’s China writings, placing them in a context of debate over whether or not existing philosophical and cultural traditions could be reconciled with Christian theology.L'article aborde la question suivante : est-ce que le bon ordre des concepts peut être considéré un élément essentiel de rigueur scientifique dans la logique et les mathématiques de xixe et xxe siècle, en particulier quand il s'agit d'auteurs qui ont été influencés profondément par le projet leibnizien de la caractéristique?

), L'affaire de Monsieur Kortholt oder: Leibniz undercover—Eine Miszelle aus der Praxis der Leibnizedition.Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. M. R. Antognazza.Daniel Garber, Leibniz, and Early Modern Philosophy. Since I write here for an unusually well-informed and well-motivate audience, I allow myself compressed formulations of controversial arguments, antecedently acknowledging need for elaboration. (The Right Order of Concepts: Graßmann, Peano, Gödel and the Inheritance of Leibniz's Universal Characteristic. I argue that the existence of these physical boundaries is mind-independent to such an extent as to pose a significant challenge to idealist interpretations of Leibniz. (Von Menschen und Tieren – Leibniz über Apperzeption, Reflexion und conscientia.The Oxford Handbook of Leibniz: Edited by Maria Rosa Antognazza, New York, Oxford University Press, 2018, Pp. La rup­ture scientifique déterminée par la création des systèmes axiomatico-deductifs en mathématiques et logique doit donc être associée à certains éléments de continuité qui regardent l'idéal de la connaissance en tant que recherche d'une théorie générale des concepts à obtenir par composition de certains éléments fondamentaux.This paper tackles the question of whether the order of concepts was still a relevant aspect of scientific rigour in the 19th and 20th centuries, especially in the case of authors who were deeply influenced by the Leibnizian project of a universal characteristic. A corollary of Leibniz’s explanation is that physical bodies do have boundaries with which geometric surfaces can be compared to very high levels of precision. We encourage you to help if you are qualified. Despite his fame as a philosopher, Leibniz was a diplomat by profession, and seldom managed to engage in sustained philosophical activity for any length of time.

(Leibniz and Strawson: A New Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. Pp. (Leibniz’s Mechanical Principles : Commentary and Translation. Xerox copies may be made, although the Van Pelt Library stressesFor those interested in issues raised in P. F. Strawson’s Individuals, Brown’s book is a welcome sign.

Choose how you want to monitor it: Études Sur la Signification Historique de la Philosophie de Leibniz.The Oxford Handbook of Leibniz, Ed. works and the apparent contradictions of the theory of the continuum contained in them, seem to have interpreted Leibniz’s disclaimers as amounting to a complete renunciation of them. Kontinuität und Mechanismus: zur Philosophie des jungen Leibniz in ihrem ideengeschichtlichen Kontext.

Furthermore, some of the most important Leibnizian doctrines that influenced Kant are collected and their role in Kant's philosophy is discussed. 160, $1.95. Despite the subtitle, it does not address the topic of revisionary vs. descriptive metaphysics. (G. W. Leibniz: De Summa Rerum: Metaphysical Papers, 1675-6.  own descriptive term, penned between December of 1675 and his arrival at the court in Hanover in December of 1676, has been available for the greater part of this century only to a handful of Leibniz scholars. Field 2005 discusses some recent debates concerning the a priori in general and logical and mathematical knowledge in particular. (Leibniz and Arnauld: A Commentary on Their Correspondence.Leibniz and Clarke: A Study of Their Correspondence.José Ortega y Gasset, La idea de principio en Leibniz y la evolución de la teoría deductiva.